Common
Good
Finance™

We need you!

wherever you are
with no obligation
here's why
creating Common Good Bank™ communities, economics for a sustainable world

 

Forum

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

Yielding to the FDIC/NCUA demands and losing locally empowered decision-making

Add a New Topic Reply to Post
No Tags
UserPost

1:45 am
July 14, 2010


ekrawczyk

Gunnison, CO

Member

posts 11

I'd like to discuss the dilemma that our local credit union faced with their NCUA insurer/auditor bullying them into restricting their in-house loan decisions regarding our earthship construction loan.  The credit union board denied it primarily b/c they would lose their insurance policy if they approved, what the NCUA calls is a commercial loan and secondarily, b/c the appraisal was so low due to current valuation laws.  No insured deposits means nobody's interested in making uninsured deposits.

I'm imagining CGBs might be bullied by the FDIC auditors on how to avoid certain construction loans.  Do you know if CGF has a MOU with FDIC that allows CGBs the freedom to make environmental and social sustainable loans beyond their understanding of what's "secure" for the common good?  I'm afraid we'd be in the same boat applying for a construction loan with a CGB down the road if the FDIC steps in.

2:54 pm
September 5, 2010


arkmundi

Worcester, MA

Member

posts 23

arkmundi said:

Unfortunately, the FDIC has had to step in a lot recently.  Please periodically visit http://www.fdic.gov/bank/histo…..index.html and be reminded that banks are failing a lot right now.  … There are lots of relevant questions to ask here, including the question of whether the credit markets are in the process of shutting down more, or are easing.  I believe it to be the former, and will likely persist for some time to come.  If so, what's the implication of this for CGB?


 

Here's another great link – the Problem Bank List at http://calculatedriskimages.bl…..gspot.com/.  Which can be sorted by state, to find all the banks in MA (there now six, up from two when I posted two months ago):

Athol-Clinton Co-operative Bank, Athol
First Trade Union Bank, Boston    
OneUnited Bank,    Boston
Stoneham Savings Bank, Stoneham
The Community Bank – A Massachusetts Cooperative Bank, Brockton
The First National Bank of Ipswich

Taking this a bit further, open any one of the "Enforcement Action Type" documents; for instance the Cease & Desist Order for the The Community Bank, and find (The red highlight added by me just to emphasize of few points about management practices and policies, adequate capital, and supervision.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
             WASHINGTON, D.C.
                         and
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
             DIVISION OF BANKS
_______________________________
         THE COMMUNITY BANK
     BROCKTON, MASSACHUSETTS
(INSURED STATE NONMEMBER BANK)

In the Matter of:  ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST; FDIC-09-212b

The Community Bank, Brockton, Massachusetts (Bank), having been advised of its right to a Notice of Charges and of Hearing under section 8(b) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (Act), 12 U.S.C. § 1818(b), detailing the unsafe or unsound banking practices and violations of law and regulations alleged to have been committed by the Bank, and of its right to a hearing on such alleged charges, and having waived those rights, and having waived any rights that the Bank has or may have under the Massachusetts General Laws, entered into a STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST (CONSENT AGREEMENT) with a representative of the Legal Division of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and with the Commissioner of Banks of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Commissioner), dated June 25, 2009, whereby solely for the purpose of this proceeding and without admitting or denying any unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulations, the Bank consented to the issuance of an ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST (ORDER) by the FDIC and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Banks (Division).

The FDIC and the Division considered the matter and determined that they had reason to believe that the Bank engaged in unsafe or unsound banking practices and violations of law and regulations.
The FDIC and the Division, therefore, accepted the CONSENT AGREEMENT and issued the following: ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Bank, its institution- affiliated parties, as that term is defined in section 3(u) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1813(u), and its successors and assigns, cease and desist from the following unsafe or unsound banking practices and violations of law and regulations:

a. Operating with deficient supervision by the Board of Directors (“Board”);

b. Operating with deficient management, policies, and practices;

c. Engaging in hazardous lending practices, including, but not limited to, poor credit administration practices and ineffective underwriting standards and practices.

d. Engaging in practices that produce an excessive volume of criticized assets;

e. Engaging in practices that produce an excessive volume of concentrations of credit;

f. Failing to provide for an effective system to identify problem assets and prevent deterioration;

g. Operating with a deficient allowance for loan and lease losses for the volume, type, and quantity of loans and leases held;

h. Operating with a deficient level of capital for the Bank’s risk profile;

i. Operating with deficient earnings;

j. Operating with a deficient level of liquidity and deficient funds and liquidity management practices;

k. Engaging in violations of applicable laws and regulations;

l. Engaging in contraventions of Interagency guidelines and statements of policy;

m. Operating without proper internal routine and controls; and

n. Operating with weaknesses in the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance program.

___________

6:10 pm
July 20, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 123

Post edited 6:19 pm – July 20, 2010 by wspademan


Most credit unions are not allowed to do commercial loans or are severely restricted in the size and quantity of such loans they can make. Banks have no such limitation. Part of the purpose of Common Good Bank's proposed partnership with credit unions is to enable credit unions to bypass that limitation and do nearly unlimited commercial lending. Commercial lending creates job opportunities and prosperity very directly, so that will be the mainstay of Common Good Bank lending.

However, it is still possible that the FDIC will try to bully Common Good Bank to prevent Common Good Bank from doing something that is unpopular with the powers that be. In fact, we expect this to happen at some point, once Common Good Bank begins to flourish. We have designed into the Common Good Bank system two safeguards to this danger:

  1. Common Good Bank will be accompanied by an infrastructure for innovative local financial cooperation, so that depositors in any community division can invest together in whatever they choose to invest in — regardless of whether the bank itself is permitted to make those investments. In effect, the money is loaned into existence by the depositors association rather than by the bank.
  2. Within three years or so of opening, we intend to establish two or more additional Common Good-type banks as a backup — preferably each in different country. In fact there is already a group in Sweden working on this. The depositors association agreement includes a clause that, in the event of Common Good Bank getting shut down, all accounts and memberships will automatically be transferred to the nearest Common Good-type bank still in operation, so that there will be no disruption in service.

What other safeguards can you think of, that we might add?

9:05 am
July 14, 2010


arkmundi

Worcester, MA

Member

posts 23

Unfortunately, the FDIC has had to step in a lot recently.  Please periodically visit http://www.fdic.gov/bank/histo…..index.html and be reminded that banks are failing a lot right now.  The credit markets open and the credit markets close, and the FDIC is one of the gate keepers.  I believe this is highly relevant, for all kinds of reasons in consideration of CGB design, timing, etc.  Let's please not blame the FDIC for doing its job.  It did not cause this financial crisis, but is doing a rather remarkable job of cleaning up after the fact.  There are lots of relevant questions to ask here, including the question of whether the credit markets are in the process of shutting down more, or are easing.  I believe it to be the former, and will likely persist for some time to come.  If so, what's the implication of this for CGB?

No Tags
Reply to Post


Reply to Topic:
Yielding to the FDIC/NCUA demands and losing locally empowered decision-making

Guest Name (Required):

Guest Email (Required):

Smileys
Confused Cool Cry Embarassed Frown Kiss Laugh Smile Surprised Wink Yell
Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
5 + 1
   



About the Common Good Finance forum

Forum Timezone: Etc/GMT+4

Most Users Ever Online: 30

Currently Online:
7 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3
Forums: 19
Topics: 59
Posts: 341

Membership:

There are 184 Members
There have been 70 Guests

There is 1 Admin
There are 5 Moderators

Top Posters:

arkmundi – 23
Edward Morrison – 12
ekrawczyk – 11
Christine – 10
niklashogberg – 7
rickdevoe – 6

Recent New Members: Richard Todd Chinnock, dpearson, snoyes, soulashell, George Gluck, Susan Spademan

Administrators: wspademan (123 Posts)

Moderators: elifarley (16 Posts), achaudoir (6 Posts), tfinnell (4 Posts), ccmeyer (2 Posts), jroot (1 Post)