Common Good Finance
the revoLution with a bank



wherever you are
here's why

Forum

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

Dissenters' Corner Proposal

Add a New Topic Reply to Post
UserPost

8:28 pm
March 8, 2011


Richard Todd Chinnock

Admin

posts 39

I like this idea, but only if we are allowed to redefine what it means to be in the corner (I spent considerable time there as a child LOL  better than spanking though!).  I had the same initial reaction to the dissenters corner as Ms. Cork.  I had an image of rolling a peice of paper into a cone and handing it to Ms. Henderson.  Fortunately I didn't follow through on it and now have come to appreciate the intention behind this proposal.

 

To me, the core of what I think Ms. Henderson is trying to convey, is that we need a space for those of us who may not be a type A personality.  Not all of us are one's to make a scene in order for our voice to be heard.

 

I see it as a representation for people to wordlessly say in a group,

 

"Hey, you've got me backed into a corner here!"

 

This should make the rest of us sit up in attention.  Of course we do not want to have other's feel like they are trapped and we need to take action to capture the essence of the dissent.  This proposal could do that.

 

On a meta theme.  The concept of harnessing dissent as a vital component of Common Good Communities should not be minimized.  Dissent ought to be recognized as a key ingredient to our creative potential.

 

 

12:50 pm
February 8, 2011


Linda Cork

Guest

Wow. 

 

Three things come to mind reading this:

 

First, what happened to the disruptive kids in grade school? 

They were sent to stand in the corner.

 

Second, what happened to dissenters during the G.W. Bush administration?

They were confined to "free speech zones", where presumably their dissenting opinions could be voiced to each other without disturbing "the majority", who were relieved of the burden of seeing or hearing anyone who disagreed with them.

 

Finally, "separate but equal activities"?  Really?  Where have I heard the words "separate but equal" before?  Hmmm…

Oh yeah, that's right, and I think we all came to an understanding about 40 years ago that "separate but equal" was never "equal"

 

This has got to be about the worst, most mis-guided idea I have ever heard.  If a small group of people can't withstand a few differing opinions when they are starting an organization, if they can't allow for free exchange of ideas and vigorous debate and even disagreement, then perhaps there is no real basis for that group to exist.   

12:37 am
February 8, 2011


Pp

Guest

As things have been going well, perhaps we could continue as we are.  I encourage people to bring things up within the structure we have, and let either counseling or council-ing, take place on our own time, not in meeting time.

1:15 pm
February 7, 2011


Janet Henderson

New Member

posts 2

Post edited 3:03 pm – February 7, 2011 by wspademan


I would like to propose the idea of a "Dissenters' Corner" for all future retreats and meetings.

A "Dissenters' Advocate" should be appointed/volunteered at the beginning of each event, and that person is charged with the task of investigating the nature and extent of any dissension that occurs during a meeting, workshop, or retreat.

Any time a person is in disagreement over an activity during an event, or the direction the activity is taking while it is going on, or the direction of the event in toto, rather than

disrupt the activity, or continue in spite of their objection, the person can leave the group and go to the Dissenter's Corner.

This would be a designated space (pointed out with ceremony at the beginning of each event) (and with a sign labelling it) where there is a designated "Official Dissenters' Journal" (that is saved from event to event) and a pen. A page should be titled with the date and the overall event name and rows underneath labelled: "Name," "Time," "Activity," and then several blank lines following "Reason for Dissent."

After the person documents their objection, they can either stay in that space, or they can go do whatever they want instead.

If the person(s) going to the dissenters' corner stands facing the facilitator and holds up a hand, this means that the person is experiencing strong emotion/opposition and wishes to be heard now. The "Dissenters' Advocate" (who should be sitting where he/she can see the Dissenters' Corner, should get up immediately and find out what the dissenter is objecting

to. If the advocate feels the concern is of sufficient import, he/she can stop the activity. Also, if there are a number of people in the dissenters' corner during an activity, the advocate should go and find out what the issue is and perhaps stop the activity.

If there is more than one person in the dissenters' corner who stays in the space, then the advocate should help to moderate a separate but equal activity (with profitable productivity) with those dissenting, so that their time will not be wasted.

If there was only mild dissent, at the end of the activity, the advocate should read any

"Dissenting Comments" to the group before the next activity and ask for a brief discussion and a determination if the dissenting comments should alter the situation in any way. A vote can be held, if deemed necessary.

The idea of the Dissenters' Corner is to minimize emotional coercion and peer pressure, whether real or perceived, and to provide a formalized forum for alternate, minority,

opinions. Everyone's opinions are valued and respected and even, in a sense, courted. Everyone will be able to have their opinions and feelings heard, taken into account, and so on. Something this important shouldn't be left to chance.

Thoughts?

Janet Henderson

By the way, If you are going to join the ranks of the Certified Dissenters (which requires many months of conscientious effort and passing three tests of increasing difficulty), for goodness sake, put on your Dissenters' Hat first! :)

Reply to Post


Reply to Topic:
Dissenters' Corner Proposal

Guest Name (Required):

Guest Email (Required):

Smileys
Confused Cool Cry Embarassed Frown Kiss Laugh Smile Surprised Wink Yell
Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
7 + 8
   



About the Common Good Finance forum

Forum Timezone: Etc/GMT+4

Most Users Ever Online: 148

Currently Online:
8 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3
Forums: 22
Topics: 132
Posts: 665

Membership:

There are 350 Members
There have been 146 Guests

There are 2 Admins
There are 5 Moderators

Top Posters:

John G Root Jr – 39
arkmundi – 23
rjones – 16
ekrawczyk – 15
Edward Morrison – 12
Christine – 11

Recent New Members: Cory H. Vinyard, Cesium, Thomas Sumney, Michael Sam, Nancy Bair, William Cerf

Administrators: wspademan (218 Posts), Richard Todd Chinnock (39 Posts)

Moderators: elifarley (16 Posts), achaudoir (12 Posts), tfinnell (4 Posts), ccmeyer (2 Posts), jroot (1 Post)