Common
Good
Finance™

We need you!

wherever you are
with no obligation
here's why
creating common good banks™, economics for a sustainable world

 

Common Good Democracy™ - Where Is It Used


SYSTEMEXAMPLE
C Proxy voting corporations
G Direct representation attorneys
B Line-item veto governors
Instant Runoff Voting Ireland
D Grading schools
E Internet voting many organizations
M Condorcet high tech orgs
O Direct vote town meetings
C Penny vote public policy polls
R Approval voting scheduling
A Threshing sessions hearings
C Consensus Iroquois / Quakers
Friendly decisions families

The overall common good bank combination of systems is very close to what people do informally within families and groups of close friends -- people we care about and share common interests with. If we're going on an outing, for example, and want to decide where to go, here's what we do: we talk about it, we take everyone's preferences into account (whether they are present or not), and we generally don't go where someone just won't go. That's what the common good bank voting system aims to do.

By combining the best of each of these systems, the common good bank democratic process will nudge society toward a more participatory, compassionate and effective self-rule. (See also "How Is It Better" and "Spectrum of Economic Systems".) Every individual component of the common good bank democratic system has been used successfully elsewhere:

  • Proxy voting is the standard system used by corporations.
  • Direct vote is used in public referenda and New England town meetings.
  • Direct representation is used in corporate proxy votes and legal representation by an attorney or legal guardian.
  • Approval voting is the usual method used within organizations, for scheduling meetings ("Which days are you available?").
  • Condorcet (pair-wise) voting requires complex data-processing. It is currently used mostly by high-tech environments, including Software In the Public Interest, Inc., Gentoo Foundation, all Debian user groups (Debian is a popular Linux operating system), and a dozen other organizations.
  • Penny vote is used by activist organization to poll the public on public policy issues. For example, Peace Action Coalition polls taxpayers every year on Tax Day to see how they would like their tax dollars to be spent.
  • Line-item veto is used by state governors in all but seven states in the United States of America.
  • Advisory veto / Consensus was used by the Iroquois Confederacy Grand Council as early as 1142 and by Quakers since the late 1600s.
  • Threshing sessions happen whenever people gather to discuss something, without trying to decide anything. This includes public hearings by corporations and government agencies and discussions in New England town meetings in which a new proposal evolves.
  • Internet voting has been used by France, the Netherland, Estonia, and Ontario, Canada. Some corporations, universities and other organizations also now use internet voting.
  • Instant Runoff Voting is used in Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, San Francisco, CA, Burlington, VT, Cambridge, MA and many other municipalities.
  • Grading is used in schools and for everything from movies to maple syrup. Slightly different grading systems are common in different countries and the common good bank™ voting system can be adjusted accordingly. The A B C D E system described on this website is intended for use in the United States and other countries where such letter grades are common.


Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

Common Good Democracy™

Comment on this Subject
PersonComment

11:10 pm
March 1, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

rseserman said:

Even the concept of running the bank democratically was questioned: “If Joe has enough friends to vote funding for Joe’s business which will eventually fail, what good does for the community” or “Democracy is good as an oversight mechanism but operationally… how would be the army to operate democratically?”

The democratic process maybe can be changed from an active involvement, which is also very time consuming, to a passive way. I am thinking to ask members to allocate their money over a given set of  areas of lending as they join. They can change the allocation as they want  but at their own convenience thus avoiding a periodic voting process that can be very counter productive. The actual lending decisions will be left for lending professionals, trained to the bank rules.

We do not plan to make business (operational) decisions democratically. Depositors will set lending priorities, but will not decide on individual loans.

Depositors always have the choice whether or not to be actively involved in decisions that are in their domain. Taking away that choice would decrease democracy with no benefit to the depositors. It is important that SOMEONE think again about the lending priorities from time to time, because the situation in the community is always changing. The depositors should be allowed a voice in those discussions and decisions.

8:20 pm
February 22, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

Post edited 8:21 pm - February 22, 2010 by wspademan


Ted Millich said:You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy.


Sociocracy is a great way to govern an organization and we expect to incorporate principles of sociocracy in running the bank business. Depositors, on the other hand, will not be making decisions about an organization but rather about funding the common good; so some features of sociocracy would be unnecessarily cumbersome. Still, we expect that communities will use, in their in-person discussions, many principles of sociocracy and other disciplines such as varieties of ConsensusDeep Democracy, etc.

11:06 pm
February 21, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

Philip Beard said:It's unclear how the multiple-choice preference example given (A+ABCDFNo) relates to the Condorcet paired-preference method. Aren't you conflating the two here?


Multiple choice grading is a way of expressing preferences. Condorcet is a way of analyzing data and calculating results.There is no conflict between them.

If someone grades option #1 "A" and option #2 "C", for example, it is clear that the person prefers option #1 to option #2. Similarly, if the person grades two options the same, then we can infer that the person has no preference between the two options. This is all the information that is required for Condorcet calculation.

Grading gives more information with less effort, than having to compare each pair of options individually.

3:06 pm
November 9, 2009


Trevor

Guest

http://www.directrep.org is a site about Direct Representation.

10:48 am
January 16, 2010


Philip Beard

Guest

It's unclear how the multiple-choice preference example given (A+ABCDFNo) relates to the Condorcet paired-preference method. Aren't you conflating the two here?

3:07 pm
January 8, 2010


Ted Millich

Guest

You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy. It is a governance method that has been designed over many years using trial and error, and knowledge of technical disciplines like cybernetics, chaos theory, electronics, etc. The most amazing thing about this method is it keeps people equivalent in power. It works well and you can find out more about it at http://www.beyonddemocracythefilm.com

Please reply to me if you're from Common Good Finance.

Have a great day!

8:54 pm
February 21, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

To see this discussion in context, click here.

Comment on this Subject


Reply to Topic:
Common Good Democracy™

Guest Name (Required):

Guest Email (Required):

Smileys
Confused Cool Cry Embarassed Frown Kiss Laugh Smile Surprised Wink Yell
Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
10 + 4