Common
Good
Finance™

We need you!

wherever you are
with no obligation
here's why
creating Common Good Bank™ communities, economics for a sustainable world

 

Common Good Democracy™ - The Bank's Board of Directors


Organizational Structure

Common Good Bank depositors will control, within each community, how the bank's profits and grants of created money are distributed, what the investment priorities will be (in broad terms), and in some cases whether to invest in a particular industry or company.

The bank's board of directors will be responsible for balancing those investment priorities against the bank's policies on prudent investment and compliance with state and federal regulations. It is essential that the directors be chosen in a way that guarantees diverse business expertise while faithfully representing the depositors, remaining true to the bank's mission to advance the common good of all. Each Regional Division of the bank (probably at least one per state, province, or country) will have its own board of directors and will operate almost entirely independently. Each Community Division will have its own Division Advisers and will also operate independently, subject to oversight by a Regional Division. Division Advisers will be responsible for pre-screening loan applications and for wording the questions and options that depositors vote on.

The bank's board of directors will be composed of twelve or fourteen directors with diverse responsibilities, who will work together to ensure the financial and moral health of the bank. This board will maintain the required balance, combining the advantages of for-profit and nonprofit business in two ways:

  • The board will select at least half of its directors from among the former Division Advisors (who were elected democratically by the depositors).
  • One committee will be specifically responsible for focusing on and upholding the common good, the overriding mission of the bank.

Nomination Procedure

Directors and Division Advisers do not run for office. They are nominated automatically by depositors' choices of ongoing proxies, as described in the section on Representatives. The N+3 most trusted willing representatives -- that is, the representatives who have recently voted on behalf of the most depositors and who have agreed to serve -- will appear on the ballot for N seats on the board. Depositors will choose from among them by multiple-choice vote.

Qualifications

Directors and Division Advisors will serve staggered 3-year terms and will be responsible for training subsequent directors. All directors must have significant business and/or financial experience, creativity, common sense, a record of service to the community and proven ability to handle responsibility, working effectively both independently and cooperatively. Directors will be paid an hourly rate that falls between the 50th and 75th percentiles of hourly rates in the Bank's service area (typically between $20 and $25 an hour).

Committees

  1. Executive Committee (4 members). Authorized to act on behalf of the full board between its regular meetings. Reviews and coordinates information from other committees. Composed of the chairs of the other committees.
  2. Common Good Committee (3). Responsible for focusing on and upholding the mission of the Bank; that is, the common good of the depositors, the wider community and the world. Oversees and reports on compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. Oversees the democratic process and potential collaborations with nonprofits and with other Common Good Bank communities. Identifies entrepreneurial opportunities -- new industries needed in the community that might be launched with capital from the bank.
  3. Audit Committee (3). Ensures that the Bank complies with all applicable laws and regulations. Oversees internal controls, hires and communicates with independent auditors, makes recommendations to the board, based on auditor's and bank examiner's reports. Members of this committee may not participate in the Banks offerings of business loans (or any unsecured loan) or any other insider relationships that might interfere with independent judgment.
  4. Asset, Liability and Investment Committee (3). Oversees capital, funding, and asset allocation. Manages risk. Ensures diversity of investments, adequate capital and liquidity and low exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Establishes and revises lending policies. Sets standards for appraisal of collateral. Reviews and approves (or disapproves) unusual loan applications.
  5. Personnel and Human Relations Committee (3). Establishes policies to attract and keep high quality personnel. Oversees systems to minimize the possibility of embezzlement. Promotes a friendly, safe and enjoyable work environment. Hires and provides oversight and review for a General Manager (CEO). Establishes training programs for all employees, volunteers and Directors, including plans for succession of the General Manager and Directors. Oversees Bank policies and practices related to individual customer relations.


Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

Common Good Democracy™

Comment on this Subject
PersonComment

11:28 am
April 15, 2010


Ted Millich

Guest

wspademan said:

Ted Millich said:You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy.


Sociocracy is a great way to govern an organization and we expect to incorporate principles of sociocracy in running the bank business. Depositors, on the other hand, will not be making decisions about an organization but rather about funding the common good; so some features of sociocracy would be unnecessarily cumbersome. Still, we expect that communities will use, in their in-person discussions, many principles of sociocracy and other disciplines such as varieties of ConsensusDeep Democracy, etc.


 

It can be difficult for people to really understand sociocracy because it is not in any way equivalent to "consensus, deep democracy, etc." If you don't understand that sociocracy is a complete system that is designed to restrict power centralization, you can make assumptions that are relevant to current domination-based methods, but not to sociocracy. Deciding to have depositors make decisions "about funding the common good" and not "making decisions about an organization" is perfectly compatible with sociocracy. I fear that your evaluation of "some features of sociocracy" being "unnecessarily cumbersome" is based on not really understanding it. Even people who have practiced sociocracy for years still find themselves thinking in terms of typical domination-based sometimes processes because we are all so conditioned to think that way. Every part of sociocracy was designed through trial and error and serves a purpose. If you leave "some features" out, you leave your group open to domination, even if it's unintentional, by one person or block. Cry

I'm all for using many different techniques and disciplines. Sociocracy is compatible with that. My fear is that if you don't use all of sociocracy, you have problems (and might blame the method). It's like riding a bike and having only one hand on the handlebar. It may work for awhile, but you will not be able to use full capacities and will, at some point, fall down. Yell I have never found any part of sociocracy to be "unnecessarily cumbersome" and wonder where you came up with that.

Perhaps the best benefit of sociocracy is not just a better functioning enterprise, but that fact that sociocracy shows us literally in front of our eyes how power works. It can be a long process. It sometimes takes years for a person practicing sociocracy to realize what
their own power is and to step forward and take it. Personally, now that I see so clearly how power flows, I am loathe to give up power by using consensus as the decision-making method (remember sociocracy is a lot more than just the consent decision-making method).

Sociocracy is not just a "discipline" or tool. It is a whole system that has been designed to do something no other social system in history has ever succeeded at (restrict power centralization) and that is no small feat. Smile In fact, I believe it is key to our survival. Surprised

I would love to correspond with whoever is involved with Common Good governance - more for my learning than for more plugging of sociocracy. I would like to find out how you went about learning about different governance concepts and where you found out about sociocracy. Smile teddidread at earthlink dot net

 

11:10 pm
March 1, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 83

rseserman said:

Even the concept of running the bank democratically was questioned: “If Joe has enough friends to vote funding for Joe’s business which will eventually fail, what good does for the community” or “Democracy is good as an oversight mechanism but operationally… how would be the army to operate democratically?”

The democratic process maybe can be changed from an active involvement, which is also very time consuming, to a passive way. I am thinking to ask members to allocate their money over a given set of  areas of lending as they join. They can change the allocation as they want  but at their own convenience thus avoiding a periodic voting process that can be very counter productive. The actual lending decisions will be left for lending professionals, trained to the bank rules.

We do not plan to make business (operational) decisions democratically. Depositors will set lending priorities, but will not decide on individual loans.

Depositors always have the choice whether or not to be actively involved in decisions that are in their domain. Taking away that choice would decrease democracy with no benefit to the depositors. It is important that SOMEONE think again about the lending priorities from time to time, because the situation in the community is always changing. The depositors should be allowed a voice in those discussions and decisions.

8:20 pm
February 22, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 83

Post edited 8:21 pm - February 22, 2010 by wspademan


Ted Millich said:You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy.


Sociocracy is a great way to govern an organization and we expect to incorporate principles of sociocracy in running the bank business. Depositors, on the other hand, will not be making decisions about an organization but rather about funding the common good; so some features of sociocracy would be unnecessarily cumbersome. Still, we expect that communities will use, in their in-person discussions, many principles of sociocracy and other disciplines such as varieties of ConsensusDeep Democracy, etc.

11:06 pm
February 21, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 83

Philip Beard said:It's unclear how the multiple-choice preference example given (A+ABCDFNo) relates to the Condorcet paired-preference method. Aren't you conflating the two here?


Multiple choice grading is a way of expressing preferences. Condorcet is a way of analyzing data and calculating results.There is no conflict between them.

If someone grades option #1 "A" and option #2 "C", for example, it is clear that the person prefers option #1 to option #2. Similarly, if the person grades two options the same, then we can infer that the person has no preference between the two options. This is all the information that is required for Condorcet calculation.

Grading gives more information with less effort, than having to compare each pair of options individually.

3:06 pm
November 9, 2009


Trevor

Guest

http://www.directrep.org is a site about Direct Representation.

10:48 am
January 16, 2010


Philip Beard

Guest

It's unclear how the multiple-choice preference example given (A+ABCDFNo) relates to the Condorcet paired-preference method. Aren't you conflating the two here?

3:07 pm
January 8, 2010


Ted Millich

Guest

You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy. It is a governance method that has been designed over many years using trial and error, and knowledge of technical disciplines like cybernetics, chaos theory, electronics, etc. The most amazing thing about this method is it keeps people equivalent in power. It works well and you can find out more about it at http://www.beyonddemocracythefilm.com

Please reply to me if you're from Common Good Finance.

Have a great day!

8:54 pm
February 21, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 83

To see this discussion in context, click here.

Comment on this Subject


Reply to Topic:
Common Good Democracy™

Guest Name (Required):

Guest Email (Required):

Smileys
Confused Cool Cry Embarassed Frown Kiss Laugh Smile Surprised Wink Yell
Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
12 + 9