Common
Good
Finance™

We need you!

wherever you are
with no obligation
here's why
creating common good banks™, economics for a sustainable world

 

Common Good Democracy™ - How Budget Options Are Chosen


  1. Disbursing Profits

    There are innumerable ways we could spend the bank's profits for the greater good. How do we decide which ones to put on the ballot?

    First of all, only nonprofit organizations are eligible to receive part of the bank's profits. Of course they in turn can distribute funds to a wider variety of initiatives.

    Second, to qualify for a place on the ballot, an organization must have significant support from the members of the bank, in the current year:

    1. The organization must be supported financially by at least ten members of the bank AND
    2. The organization must receive (in aggregate) at least $1,000* in individual donations from members of the bank.

    This qualifying procedure encourages members to contribute to the nonprofits of their choice and to recruit additional contributions from other members. This increases financial support for local, national and international nonprofits even before the bank's profits are distributed.

  2. Recommending Loans

    Member depositors in each community discuss and vote on the community's investment priorities.

    Each loan application in the community then goes to an elected group of three Division Advisors. The Division Advisors judge the application both as a business proposition and as a component of the community's investment priorities:

    • how credit-worthy are the borrowers?
    • how sound is the business plan?
    • how well does the proposal agree with the community's chosen investment priorities?
    • how well does the proposal serve the common good?

    The Division Advisors forward their recommendations to the bank's (national level) lending committee, which judges the proposal's adherence to the bank's overall lending policies related to (1) risk and (2) socially responsible lending for the common good. These policies will be the minimum necessary to assure sound business lending and steady progress toward sustainability and economic justice.

    The bank's loan committee, general manager and board of directors have the final say about which specific loans the bank approves, influenced by the broad lending priorities set by the member depositors, but constrained by what lending opportunities are actually available. Since the central purpose of common good banks is to give communities control over their own economic destiny, the recommendations of Division Advisors will generally be followed unless there are compelling reasons against them. In practice, we expect that the loan commitee will work with the Division Advisors and borrowers to resolve disagreements productively.

    Member depositors can greatly influence the bank's approval of specific loans to small businesses or for specific community initiatives by investing in them directly, contingent on the bank's participation. Members can choose to invest any amount in a given project, at any interest rate up to the planned rate of return on bank stock. This gives the bank's lending team a clear sense of how much community confidence and support there is for that project, which will result in safer investments, strongly aligned with the community's values.

* $1,000: This minimum will vary from community to community.



Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

Common Good Democracy™

Comment on this Subject
PersonComment

11:10 pm
March 1, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

rseserman said:

Even the concept of running the bank democratically was questioned: “If Joe has enough friends to vote funding for Joe’s business which will eventually fail, what good does for the community” or “Democracy is good as an oversight mechanism but operationally… how would be the army to operate democratically?”

The democratic process maybe can be changed from an active involvement, which is also very time consuming, to a passive way. I am thinking to ask members to allocate their money over a given set of  areas of lending as they join. They can change the allocation as they want  but at their own convenience thus avoiding a periodic voting process that can be very counter productive. The actual lending decisions will be left for lending professionals, trained to the bank rules.

We do not plan to make business (operational) decisions democratically. Depositors will set lending priorities, but will not decide on individual loans.

Depositors always have the choice whether or not to be actively involved in decisions that are in their domain. Taking away that choice would decrease democracy with no benefit to the depositors. It is important that SOMEONE think again about the lending priorities from time to time, because the situation in the community is always changing. The depositors should be allowed a voice in those discussions and decisions.

8:20 pm
February 22, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

Post edited 8:21 pm - February 22, 2010 by wspademan


Ted Millich said:You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy.


Sociocracy is a great way to govern an organization and we expect to incorporate principles of sociocracy in running the bank business. Depositors, on the other hand, will not be making decisions about an organization but rather about funding the common good; so some features of sociocracy would be unnecessarily cumbersome. Still, we expect that communities will use, in their in-person discussions, many principles of sociocracy and other disciplines such as varieties of ConsensusDeep Democracy, etc.

11:06 pm
February 21, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

Philip Beard said:It's unclear how the multiple-choice preference example given (A+ABCDFNo) relates to the Condorcet paired-preference method. Aren't you conflating the two here?


Multiple choice grading is a way of expressing preferences. Condorcet is a way of analyzing data and calculating results.There is no conflict between them.

If someone grades option #1 "A" and option #2 "C", for example, it is clear that the person prefers option #1 to option #2. Similarly, if the person grades two options the same, then we can infer that the person has no preference between the two options. This is all the information that is required for Condorcet calculation.

Grading gives more information with less effort, than having to compare each pair of options individually.

3:06 pm
November 9, 2009


Trevor

Guest

http://www.directrep.org is a site about Direct Representation.

10:48 am
January 16, 2010


Philip Beard

Guest

It's unclear how the multiple-choice preference example given (A+ABCDFNo) relates to the Condorcet paired-preference method. Aren't you conflating the two here?

3:07 pm
January 8, 2010


Ted Millich

Guest

You need to find out about Dynamic Governance, or Sociocracy. It is a governance method that has been designed over many years using trial and error, and knowledge of technical disciplines like cybernetics, chaos theory, electronics, etc. The most amazing thing about this method is it keeps people equivalent in power. It works well and you can find out more about it at http://www.beyonddemocracythefilm.com

Please reply to me if you're from Common Good Finance.

Have a great day!

8:54 pm
February 21, 2010


wspademan

Admin

posts 46

To see this discussion in context, click here.

Comment on this Subject


Reply to Topic:
Common Good Democracy™

Guest Name (Required):

Guest Email (Required):

Smileys
Confused Cool Cry Embarassed Frown Kiss Laugh Smile Surprised Wink Yell
Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
10 + 7